In article <mailman.1734.1270954853.23598.python-l...@python.org>, geremy condra <debat...@gmail.com> wrote: >On Sun, Apr 11, 2010 at 1:17 AM, Steven D'Aprano ><st...@remove-this-cybersource.com.au> wrote: >> On Sat, 10 Apr 2010 13:34:17 -0700, Paul Rubin wrote: >>> Steven D'Aprano <st...@remove-this-cybersource.com.au> writes: >>>> >>>> DISCLAIMER: obfuscate is not cryptographically strong, and should not >>>> be used where high security is required. >>> >>> Certainly no one should never use obfuscate's rot13 function for high >>> security. Use at least double-rot13 instead, or maybe even quadruple >>> rot13 ;-). >> >> Ha ha, that's funny! I've never heard that one before! *wink* > >I think I lost a sarcasm detector to this line- are you being serious?
There are people who have a .sig that says, "This message protected by double-rot13 for extra security." It's an extremely common jape. -- Aahz (a...@pythoncraft.com) <*> http://www.pythoncraft.com/ "It is easier to optimize correct code than to correct optimized code." --Bill Harlan -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
