On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 3:15 PM, Ethan Furman <et...@stoneleaf.us> wrote:
> Vincent Davis wrote: > >> >> What you are pointing out is that the assignment is not reversed . But >> that does make me thing of something I had not. >> >> >>> afoo.letter['a'] = 345 >> >>> afoo.A >> 1 >> >> Thats kinda a bummer, whats a good way to make sure afoo.A gets updated? >> > > It's possible, and not too tough, but... why do you need it done that way? > Keeping redundant information seems like extra work with no advantage. > > Not sure I do, basicly I have a long list of values that could be calculated from data. Some may take some time depending on the amount of data. I don't what to calculate them all if not needed but I don't what the user to need to know which are and which are not. But maybe @property is what I need to be looking at, see my other post on the list. Thanks Vincent > ~Ethan~ > -- > http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list > *Vincent Davis 720-301-3003 * vinc...@vincentdavis.net my blog <http://vincentdavis.net> | LinkedIn<http://www.linkedin.com/in/vincentdavis>
-- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
