On Jun 14, 2:16 pm, lkcl <luke.leigh...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Jun 14, 5:57 pm, rantingrick <rantingr...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > I'll have to very much agree with this assessment Stephan. There > > exists not elegant API for these "web" UI's. The people over at > > SketchUp (my second love after python) have this problem on a daily > > bases with WebDialogs. Even the javascript gurus have a dificult time > > juggling javascript, CSS, and Ruby code to make these grumpy beasts > > come to life, and when they do it ain't really pretty. > > ah. again, the "recommended" pyjamas development model vs the > "standard" development model comes to the rescue, here. in a pyjamas > app, the app loads ONCE and ONLY ONCE, as one whopping great > javascript behemoth which can be somewhere around 2mb if the original > python (pyjamas) source is around... 15 to 20,000 lines of code.
Hmm, we have a Python API already worked out. I wonder how much trouble it would be to get pyjamas into this API. The SketchUp folks are just busting at the seems for a more developer friendly web dialog environment and SketchUp WebDialogs just ain't cutting the mustard (more like the cheese!). Let me know if you may interested in spearheading this endeavor as i can offer my motivational skills to push the product and help you work out a friendly API! -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list