On 6/17/10 12:44 PM, MRAB wrote:
> Neil Cerutti wrote:
>> On 2010-06-17, Ian Kelly <ian.g.ke...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 11:45 AM, Neil Cerutti
>>> <ne...@norwich.edu> wrote:
>>>> What's the best way to do the inverse operation of the .join
>>>> function?
>>> Use the str.split method?
>>
>> split is perfect except for what happens with an empty string.
>>
> I see what you mean.
>
> This is consistent:
>
>>>> ','.join([''])
> ''
>>>> ''.split(',')
> ['']
>
> but this isn't:
>
>>>> ','.join([])
> ''
>>>> ''.split(',')
> ['']
>
> An empty string could be the result of .join(['']) or .join([]).
>
> Should .split grow an addition keyword argument to specify the desired
> behaviour? (Although it's simple enough to define your own function.)
Guido finds keyword-arguments-to-change-behavior to be unPythonic, IIRC.
It generally means 'make a new API'. But, the question is-- is it worth
the mental strain of a new API?
This is such an extreme edge case, having to do:
if blah:
result = blah.split(',')
else:
result = []
Is really not asking too much, I think.
--
Stephen Hansen
... Also: Ixokai
... Mail: me+list/python (AT) ixokai (DOT) io
... Blog: http://meh.ixokai.io/
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
