quote: > > I didn't notice this level of angst when Python made equally significant > changes going from 1.5 to 2.0... admittedly Python 1.5 code would work > unchanged in 2.0, but the 2.x series introduced MUCH bigger additions to > Python than anything 3.0 and 3.1 have added, and anyone taking advantage > of those changes is implicitly writing code which is not backwards > compatible.
Maybe the print statement is like the wart of Python. It maybe ugly, but it adds character. Could you imagine Lemmy lasered his? Of course people are angsty that *their* Python might not be the same! But I can relieve those who are: The interactive command line shell IPython delivers an autocompletion where parenthesis for _any_ function may be left out. Now, how does that sound? Ruby anyone? ;) Sincerely, Malte -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
