On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 1:08 PM, Edward A. Falk <f...@green.rahul.net> wrote: > In article <mailman.2270.1277736664.32709.python-l...@python.org>, > Stephen Hansen <me+list/pyt...@ixokai.io> wrote: >> >>No one said otherwise, or that print was useless and never used in such >>contexts. > > I was responding to the question "Also, do you use print *that* > much? Really?" The implication being that in the majority of useful > python programs, you don't really need to use print. > > My answer is yes, I use print in 100% of the scripts I write, including > the large useful ones. > > For this reason alone, python 3 is incompatible with python 2 (which > has already been acknowledged.) > > Until such time as 100% of the systems I might ever want to run my progams > on have python 3 installed, I cannot port my programs over from python 2.
There are people working on a workaround for that: http://pypi.python.org/pypi/3to2 Cheers, Chris -- http://blog.rebertia.com -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
