On 7/7/10 9:46 PM, "Martin v. Löwis" wrote: >> I saw you already mentioned work toward this a few months (years ?) >> ago. Is there some kind of roadmap, or could you use some help ? I >> would really like to solve this issue as much as we possibly can, > > Well, Python 3 has already dropped stdio for its own io library, and > I do want to get rid of the remaining FILE* usage for 3.2. Any other > change needs to be discussed on python-dev first; contributions are welcome.
Really? I wasn't entirely aware of this effect of the "io" module. Somehow, without at all paying attention (because certain third party modules blocking me for awhile, I never looked close enough), I just sort of thought the "io" module was mostly thin wrappers around stdio primitives, into a more Pythonic API. This actually makes me long for Python 3 more. And adjust agendas to push my day-job work to 2.7 as soon as possible, and start a preemptive reconfiguration to support a future Py3k migration. -- Stephen Hansen ... Also: Ixokai ... Mail: me+list/python (AT) ixokai (DOT) io ... Blog: http://meh.ixokai.io/
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
