Steven D'Aprano wrote:
On Thu, 29 Jul 2010 19:29:24 +0200, Jean-Michel Pichavant wrote:
>
"mro" would have been the proper name for "super".
That's your opinion. In any case, whether super() was called super() or
mro() or aardvark() makes no difference to the functionality or whether
it is useful.
I think the point is that the name is misleading, because it
makes it *sound* like it's going to call a method in a superclass,
when it fact it might not.
--
Greg
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
