On 03/08/2010 00:03, Aahz wrote:
In article<f9e652d6-3945-4c18-92f3-b85b994fe...@k8g2000prh.googlegroups.com>,
Peter<peter.milli...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Aug 3, 7:42=A0am, Mark Lawrence<breamore...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
On 02/08/2010 00:08, candide wrote:
I can't understand why any serious programmer mentions C++. As soon as I
read it, I have to rush either to the kitchen to find a bowl to throw up
in, or head for the toilet so I can talk to the great white telephone.
With you there Mark - IMO C++ is an abortion that should never have
seen the light of day. The idea of experimenting with creating an OO
language by extending C wasn't such a bad idea for a "play thing" (by
Stroustrop) but the fact that it somehow escaped from the Lab and
people picked it up and ran with it on a commercial basis is just
plain wrong!
http://www.netfunny.com/rhf/jokes/98/May/stroustrup.html
Haven't been able to read this properly as the stomach has been shaking
too much to control the mouse and/or arrow keys/page up/down etc. Hum,
marks out of 10, 1.649072354865927**trillions. For the cryptographers,
is this a decent random number?
Kindest regards.
Mark Lawrence
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
