On Monday 30 August 2010, it occurred to Paul Rubin to exclaim: > Thomas Jollans <tho...@jollybox.de> writes: > > Actually, the Python standard library reference manual is excellent. At > > least that's my opinion.... > > What exactly are you comparing the Python docs to, I wonder? Obviously > > not something like Vala, but that goes without saying. > > I didn't know Vala had especially good docs.
Sorry for being imprecise. Let me clarify: they're practically non existent. The language docs are okay if you know C#, but there are no API docs that are more than auto-generated lists of classes and methods. > I think GCC's docs are > pretty good. Python's are mostly ok but have significant gaps. For > example, tkinter has been part of the stdlib for at least a decade but > is totally undocumented in the Python library manual. -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
