On Sep 16, 12:39 pm, alex23 <wuwe...@gmail.com> wrote: > Lawrence D'Oliveiro <l...@geek-central.gen.new_zealand> wrote: > > Why not just call Scriptomatic directly from within the Python script, then? > > Because Scriptomatic _generates scripts to access WMI_, that's what it > _does_. Are you _seriously_ advocating writing Python code to fire up > a Windows application, programmatically manipulating a GUI to generate > more Python code for your original script to import or exec? > > For your question to make any real sense, you'd want to ask "Why not > access WMI directly...", which you might notice was the first > recommendation I made. > > > Machine-generated code has no place in a source file to be maintained by a > > human. > > As you've made your disdain for Windows _perfectly_ clear through your > incessant sniping on this list, I think I'm pretty safe in saying you > have no idea of the quality of Scriptomatic's output. I don't > understand what possibly makes you believe you're qualified to make > such a statement.
Thank you all .... looks I got lot of reading to be done now based on all your suggestions. -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
