On Sep 20, 7:39 am, Bruno Desthuilliers <bruno. 42.desthuilli...@websiteburo.invalid> wrote: > Niklasro a écrit : > > > Good to learn what I'm doing :-) since important being able to explain > > choices taken farther than "doing it because it works". > > I understand the concept of modules may not correspond to java > > programming where I come from. > > Coming from Java - and specially if you only have experience with Java > -, you'll have to unlearn quite a few things. Python is 100% object - in > that everything you can bind to a name is an object, including classes, > functions, methods, and even modules - but it doesn't try to force you > into using classes when you don't need them.
Which is good since always questioning the empty declarations Java has we know empty getters and setters forced to a class and interfaces with nothing but names and no logic. With this respect I prefer python solving same problem with ½ MB python 30 MB J2EE used to with drawback only that Java had the faster physical response. You can have the buggiest code respond the fastest like a hijacked environment physically boosted you don't want and naturally choosing the slower physical response time in favor of decent development environment. Thanks Niklas -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list