Hello Christian and all .

Thanks for the comments. I am newbie to Python trying to learn all the comments, that , by the way, I am very impressed of the knowledge of the people present in this list.

I was wondering if you can comment more about what alternatives to use instead to MySql. My web solutions do not need "all the power" of a true database, I even was wondering if I couldbe able to put simple dBase files (yes, dBase files) with my web solutions.

- Any comments you can do on what to use 2.7 or 3.1? ( I guess 2.7 for what I have read) - Maybe should be another subject but... Any comments on using dBase format file with Python?

Thanks in advance.

Jorge Biquez


At 08:50 p.m. 26/10/2010, you wrote:
Am 27.10.2010 03:38, schrieb Jorge Biquez:
> And what about if I only were to develop for the web? I mean web
> applications, Mysql, etc? It would be better to still be in 2.7?

Most frameworks and database adapters at least target Python 2.6+ as
their main Python version. I guess the majority has no or only
experimental support for Python 3.1. The overall situation improves
every week.

Christian

PS: I recommend against MySQL, if you need the full power or a RDBMS.
Just try to combine foreign keys with database triggers and you'll see
which major features are still broken in MySQL. But that's just my point
of view as a power user.

--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list


--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list

Reply via email to