On 24/10/2010 13:28, Steve Holden wrote:
On 10/24/2010 4:48 AM, Martin v. Loewis wrote:
Am 24.10.2010 07:01, schrieb Steve Holden:
I was somewhat surprised to discover that Python 3 no longer allows an
exception to be raised in an except clause (or rather that it reports it
as a separate exception that occurred during the handling of the first).

I think you are misinterpreting what you are seeing. The exception being
raised actually *is* an attribute error, and it actually is the
attribute error that gets reported. It's only that reporting an
exception that has a __context__ first reports the context, then reports
the actual exception.

I don't believe I *am* misinterpreting it. The fact of the matter is
that the context is irrelevant to the user, and there should be some way
to suppress it to avoid over-complicating the traceback.

This behavior is quite reasonable during testing, but I would prefer to
exclude an explicit raise directly in the except handler since that is
hardly to be construed as accidental (whereas an exception in a function
called in the handler perhaps *should* be reported).

You may now wonder whether it is possible to set __context__ to None
somehow. See PEP 3134:

Open Issue: Suppressing Context

     As written, this PEP makes it impossible to suppress '__context__',
     since setting exc.__context__ to None in an 'except' or 'finally'
     clause will only result in it being set again when exc is raised.

I have already read that. Peter Otten has separately explained how to
suppress the behavior using sys.excepthook, which appears to be a
halfway satisfactory solution.

Suggestion: an explicit 'raise' in the exception handler excludes the context, but if you want to include it then 'raise with'. For example:

# Exclude the context
try:
    command_dict[command]()
except KeyError:
    raise CommandError("Unknown command")

# Include the context
try:
    command_dict[command]()
except KeyError:
    raise with CommandError("Unknown command")
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list

Reply via email to