In message <mailman.693.1289065102.2218.python-l...@python.org>, Robert Kern wrote:
> On 11/6/10 2:34 AM, Steve Holden wrote: > >> On 11/5/2010 6:14 PM, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote: >> >>> In message<oj46q7-v2l....@archaeopteryx.softver.org.mk>, Дамјан >>> Георгиевски wrote: >>> >>>>>> PyQt is available under the GPL and a commercial license. >>>>> >>>>> Surely you mean “proprietary” rather than “commercial”. There is >>>>> nothing about the GPL that prevents “commercial” use. >>>> >>>> I think he means a license that *he* sells comercially :) >>> >>> Presumably that’s a proprietary licence. >> >> I don't see why. GPL v2, for example, has nothing to say about the price >> charged for the software: simply that the source must be made available. > > Given the context, "PyQt is available under the GPL and a commercial > license," the commercial license Phil is talking about is not the GPL. Which is a wrong interpretation of “commercial”. -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
