rantingrick <rantingr...@gmail.com> wrote: > To be honest, i would sacrifice all the functionality of > wxWidgets if we could get pyGUI into the stdlib. Why? Well because > pyGUI would be under OUR complete control.
"You" would need to contribute something other than bullshit and vitriol in order to be able to use the word "our" in the way you do here. > *if* the community saw the potential that i see with pyGUI > and wanted to seriously do some development to bring it into 3.0 > compliance i'll bet Greg *would* be interested You can't even generate your _own_ code for this idea and yet you somehow mystically know how other people will respond? Have you _ever_ been even _close_ to being able to do this? You seem genuinely angry and shocked at times that we haven't embraced you as some kind of messianic firebrand, which doesn't really say a lot for your ability to gauge the responses & desires of others. Maybe Greg's not a complete egotist like yourself, needing the attention and constant fluffing you seem to demand before you'll even begin to consider coding. Maybe pyGUI as is scratches his itch, because rather than spending YEARS trying to offload work onto the community he just coded up what he needed to actually get something _done_, something other than masturbating over a library for its own sake. Maybe he has no interest in 3.x but has no concern with community submitted patches. A patch - I should probably explain for your sake, rick - is a diff of changes to a body of code allowing the project maintainer to integrate user submitted bug fixes and feature additions. Pretty much most project maintainers will accept them sans manifesto too. This isn't about getting your ego stroked. This isn't about which language's dick is the longest because it has its own GUI. This is about people with lives of their own making small contributions born of necessity culminating in the further growth & evolution of a useful piece of code. -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list