On Feb 2, 4:14 am, rantingrick <rantingr...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Feb 1, 8:27 am, Jean-Michel Pichavant <jeanmic...@sequans.com> > wrote: > > > In a more serious way, just count the people who second your > > prosposition. It's around 0. It is usually a good sign that you're > > wrong. This rule kinda applies to anyone, don't take it personnaly. > > Well your statment completely ignores the silent majority. Are you > telling me that this sloth of trolls, minions, and flamers that have > so far replied are represetative of this fine community.
As a member of this silent majority - we care less about IDLEs code quality than all the others that did actually care enough to even reply to you. Now stop your annoying trolling and either start working on your IDLE fork or shut up. Nobody else who agrees with you (there might be someone out there) has been ever been motivated enough to initiate this work by themselves, so unless YOU start it - it probably is never going to happen. Once it is underway you might attract some other people interested in helping to refactor or recode IDLE - but you won't know that unless you start work on it. But I think we all know exactly what you are actually going to keep doing though. -- Cheers Anton -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
