On Mon, 14 Feb 2011 19:41:00 -0800, alex23 wrote: > On Feb 15, 9:06 am, Steven D'Aprano <steve > [email protected]> wrote: >> As I see it, the biggest problems with INI files are: >> >> * the INI file module that comes with Python is quite primitive; >> >> * there are many slightly different behaviours you might want in an INI >> file, and no clean or obvious way to tell which one you are dealing >> with just from the file. > > [...] > >> Rant: what I *really hate* is when people use XML just because XML is >> the in-thing, not because they need it. > > Could it possibly be then that people use XML because a) the support is > better and b) the behaviour is more predictable? That sounds more like > good tool choice than faddism.
Of course it *could* be, but is it? I'm certainly not denying that XML can be useful for many applications, nor am I saying that INI files are sufficient for everything. But if all you need is: key = value then why use this? <entry name="key" value="value"></entry> What benefit does it give? It just increases the number of things that can go wrong. -- Steven -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
