In article <6849fd3f-5116-4b35-b274-dc76ae39f...@a11g2000pro.googlegroups.com>, RJB <rbott...@csusb.edu> wrote:
> On Feb 16, 12:48 am, Eric Brunel <eric.bru...@pragmadev.nospam.com> > wrote: > > In article <iJg5p.198317$mg5.147...@en-nntp-06.dc1.easynews.com>, > > Doug Epling <wde...@mikrotec.com> wrote: > > > > > hey, does anyone find the UML useful during Python development of larger > > > projects? > > > > Well, UML being very Java/C++ oriented, I found out that Python idioms > > were really difficult to represent in the diagrams. So I'm using it to a > > very small extent and for documentation only, just to give an idea about > > how classes are organized. For the rest, and IMHO, it's really too > > impractical to be of any use. > > Which of the 13 diagrams have tried and rejected?-) Diagrams that aren't too bound to the language like e.g the deployment diagram can still be used, of course. I was mainly talking about the class diagram, which is still the central point of a model. But I even found sequence diagrams quite hard to write for Python, unless they are very simplistic ones.
-- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
