On 3/13/2011 3:17 PM, Tim Johnson wrote:
* Tim Johnson<t...@johnsons-web.com>  [110313 08:27]:
   One other thing I just realized:
   The process stops inside of a function call to another object
   method, if that method call is removed, the process teminates.
   :) I may have a solution later today, and will relay it to you if
   found. Must have coffee first.
   I've had coffee, and also I've eaten a bit of crow. If I had no
   dignity to spare I might have dropped this thread after the last
   post, but I owe it to those who might come after me to explain
   what happened. If I have any excuse, it is that I wrote this code
   when I had about a month of python experience.

One measure of people is how big a mistake they are willing to make -- in public. I learned to always test or disclaim as 'not tested' posted code by posting undisclaimed bad code -- more than once.

   So here we go...
   The cleanup part is to write a logfile. The logfile is written by
   the write() method of a log object. The method was coded to accept
   any number of data types and execute based on the type from an
   if/elif/else code block. The cgi object was passed to the method.
   The original code follows:
   ## code begins
                if type(args) == type({}): ## it's a dictionary
                        args['time_date_stamp'] = '%s%d' % 
(std.local_time(),std.randomize(8))
                        keys = args.keys()
                        keys.sort()
                        for key in keys:
                                outfile.write('\t%s: %s\n' % (key,args[key]))
                elif type(args) == type(''):
                        outfile.write('%s\n%s\n' % (std.local_time(),args))
                elif std.IsCgiObj(args):   ## dump the cgi object
                        dump = args.getEnv('time_date_stamp=%s' % 
(std.local_time()))
                        for line in dump:
                                outfile.write('  %s\n' % line)
                else : ## default = it's a list
                        if args:
                                outfile.write('time_date_stamp=%s\n' % 
(std.local_time()))
                                for arg in args:
                                        outfile.write('  %s\n' % arg)
   ## /code ends
I did two obvious things wrong here:
First of all, std.IsCgiObj() returned false when I changed
the class name because std.IsCgiObj() tested for an explicit
match of 'cgitools' with the objects __class__.__name__ member.

Your fundamental problem is that you changed the api of your module. When you do that, you have to review all code that uses that api -- or that depends on it. But yes, a module can use a string based on the api without actually importing the module. Bad idea I think. Better to import the module and make the dependency overt, so the failure is also.
The test should be (and should have been)

   elif isinstance(args, cgi.cgitools):

This would have and will fail with a loud AttributeError when cgitools is renamed.


Secondly, and worse, the default of the test block was an assumption
and I did not test the assumption. Bad, bad, very bad!
Therefore my code attempted to process the object as a list and down
the Rabit Hole we went. And I ended up with some *really* big
logfiles :).

Thank you for confirming that I was basically right that *somewhere* there had to be a test for the name 'cgitools' whose failure lead to a loop.

Following is a tentative revision:
   ## code begins
                elif 'instance' in (str(type(args))):   ## it's an object

*Everything* is an object and therefore an instance of some class. What you are testing is whether the object is an instance of a classic class defined by a Python 2.x (classic) class statement. Rather fragile;-), as I just hinted.

class C(): pass

C()

# 2.7 prints
<__main__.C instance at 0x00C41FD0>
# 3.2 prints
<__main__.C object at 0x00F0A5F0>

class C(object): pass

C()
# 2.7 also prints
<__main__.C object at 0x00C71130>


                        if hasattr(args,'getEnv'): ## test for method
                                dump = args.getEnv('time_date_stamp=%s' % 
(std.local_time()))
                                for line in dump:
                                        outfile.write('  %s\n' % line)
                        else :
                                erh.Report("object passed to logger.write() must 
have a `getEnv()' method" )
                else : ## it's a list

 just test elif isinstance(args, list): ...

and put error message in separate else; clause

                        if type(args) != []:  ## make no assumptions
                                erh.Report('List expected in default condition 
of logger.write()')
                        if args:
                                outfile.write('time_date_stamp=%s\n' % 
(std.local_time()))
                                for arg in args:
                                        outfile.write('  %s\n' % arg)
   ## /code ends
>    ## erh.Report() writes a messages and aborts process.

Consider upgrading to 2.7 if you have not and using the logging module.

Of course, I could have problems with an object with a
malfunctioning getEnv() method, so I'll have to chew that one over
for a while.
I appreciate Terry's help. I'd welcome any other comments. I'm
also researching the use of __class__.__name__. One of my questions
is: can the implementation of an internal like __class__.__name__
change in the future?

Double double underscore names are 'special' rather than necessarily 'private'. These two are somewhat documented (3.2 Reference, 3.1, "__class__ is the instance’s class", "__name__ is the class name"). So they will not change or disappear without notice. I expect them to be pretty stable.

On the other hand, they are mostly intended for internal use by type(ob) (for every ob), str/repr(ob) (for many obs), tracebacks, and other messages. Indeed, one 'should' use type(ob) rather than ob.__class__. However, custom messages may require direct use of .__name__. As you discovered, using it for program logic has problems.

--
Terry Jan Reedy


--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list

Reply via email to