On Fri, 06 May 2011 14:57:21 -0700, scattered wrote: > is there any problem with > > (3) if li == []: > > ? > > Seems to work when I test it and seems to clearly test what you are > trying to test. The only problem might be if in some contexts == has the > semantics of checking for object identity.
Yes, if li == [] works too. But how do you know li is a list and not some other sequence type? The advantage of the "if x" test is that it is independent of the type of x. -- Steven -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
