On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 4:33 PM, rantingrick <rantingr...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Aug 12, 2:20 am, Chris Angelico <ros...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Pike is very [snip] >> Pike's purpose is [snip] >> you go to Pike[snip] >> >> I hope I make myself clear, Josephine? > > The only thing that is clear to me is that you have a hidden agenda to > incorporate pike's functionality into Python -- and this is not the > first time! > > Chris, this incessant babbling about "pike this" and "pike that" is > starting to get on my nerves. Why don't you go over to comp.lang.pike > and gush to them about how wonderful the language is.
Yeah, it's something I've mentioned a few times. I think people have mentioned C on this list a few times, too; also lisp. Of course, since this is the Python mailing list (or newsgroup, depending where you read it), we aren't allowed to mention any other languages at all. Mea culpa. I'm not seeking to add Pike's functionality into Python. I want the two languages to be different, and I want the world to have different languages. Diversity and choice promote quality in ways that you don't seem to understand. Chris Angelico -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
