----- Original Message ----- > From: Paul Rudin <paul.nos...@rudin.co.uk> > > I'm not really sure whether you intend g to yield the original values > after your "revive" or new values based on the new value of vo. But > still you can make a class that supports the iterator protocol and does > whatever you want (but you can't use the generator expression syntax). > > If you want something along these lines you should probably read up on > the .send() part of the generator protocol. > > As an aside you shouldn't really write code that uses a global in that > way.. it'll end up biting you eventually. > > Anyway... we can speculate endlessly about non-existent language > constructs, but I think we've probably done this one to death. > --
Maybe no new language construct is needed: just define that x.send() revives a generator. Yingjie -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
