On Mon, Dec 26, 2011 at 1:01 PM, Ian Kelly <ian.g.ke...@gmail.com> wrote: > You essentially have two completely independent loops that need to run > simultaneously with different timings. Sounds like a good case for > multiple threads (or processes if you prefer, but these aren:
I accidentally sent before I was finished. I was saying "or processes if you prefer, but these aren't CPU-bound, so why complicate things?" Cheers, Ian -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list