Roman Rakus, 29.02.2012 15:33: > I'm forwarding this message to python-list, since I didn't get answer on > xml-sig ML
I didn't see a message from you on that list. > I have concerns about PyXML and stdlib xml included directly in python. > Currently (in Fedora) python is trying to import PyXML, which means > other results when you have and haven't PyXML installed. What kind of "other results"? > Furthermore, python's xml provides "dom", "parsers", "sax" and "etree". > PyXML provides 'dom', 'marshal', 'parsers', 'sax', 'schema', 'utils', > 'xpath' and 'xslt'. Some modules are duplicated. Does PyXML provides > more functionality in those modules? Is python's xml better, same or > worse then PyXML? PyXML was meant as an extension and hooked into the stdlib XML support. That's only one of the reasons why it's broken now. > Anyway, python's xml is newer - is PyXML deprecated? Yes. It's a dead project. > Please keep me in CC, I'm not subscribed to the list. That may be the problem in the xml-sig case also. Stefan -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
