On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 12:12 AM, Terry Reedy <tjre...@udel.edu> wrote:
>> and you're trying to dodge around that. :/
>
> In a previous post you chided Stephen for an ad hominem comment. Above you
> make two. Both are false.
I accused you of not answering the question or shifting goalposts.
This is an attack against your response, not an attack against you
("ad hominem" literally means "to the person").
Also, I definitely tried to lighten that one up with a classy
emoticon. It's totally not fair that you're scoring points off it.
> Anyway, I think I am done with this thread.
... Good idea.
We clearly understand Python's behavior. I just spent the whole time
bickering about definitions. Ugh. I'm an idiot. Sorry for the trouble.
-- Devin
(P.S. can we all start saying "muppet" next?)
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
