Hi Ian, Well there you have me... You release code under a license, you bound by it even if later you think better of it... Seller be ware!!!!!!
> From: ian.g.ke...@gmail.com > Date: Wed, 9 May 2012 16:59:00 -0600 > Subject: Re: Open Source: you're doing it wrong - the Pyjamas hijack > To: cybor...@hotmail.com > > On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 4:30 PM, Adrian Hunt <cybor...@hotmail.com> wrote: > > > > Hi ya, > > > > Not to be confrontative but just because a project is open-source, it > > doesn't mean IP is open too!! The original idea is still property of the > > originator... It just has the global community adding their own IP and > > fixes. This is a core of corporate contracts ensuring that a developers IP > > become freely usable by the company they work for at the time, but their IP > > is still their IP. > > Luke Leighton was not the originator of the project. James Tauber > was, and his original code was a port of Google Web Toolkit. Even if > Luke could somehow be considered the "owner" of the project, it was > released under the Apache License, which includes a "/perpetual/, > worldwide, non-exclusive, no-charge, royalty-free, /irrevocable/ > copyright license to reproduce, /prepare Derivative Works of/, > publicly display, publicly perform, sublicense, and distribute the > Work and such Derivative Works". I don't agree with what Anthony has > done, but I don't see how it violates the license in any way or how > Luke has any possible recourse through IP claims.
-- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list