On 05/07/2012 22:46, Evan Driscoll wrote: > On 01/-10/-28163 01:59 PM, Alexander Blinne wrote: >> 5+0 is actually 4+0, because 5 == 4, so 5+0 gives 4. >> 5+1 is actually 4+1, which is 5, but 5 is again 4. >> 5+2 is 4+2 which is 6. > > Now all I can think is "Hoory for new math, new-hoo-hoo math" :-) > > Evan
It wont do you a bit of good to read new math! (My mind was on exactly the same track) ~Andrew -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
