Ross Ridge <rri...@csclub.uwaterloo.ca> wrote:
> No, they're very much alike. That's why all your arguments for print
> as function also apply just as well to pass a function. Your arguments
> had very little to do what what print actually did.
Chris Angelico <ros...@gmail.com> wrote:
>Except that print / print() is executable. Execution proceeds through
>your code, comes to a "print", and goes off to handle that, then comes
>back to your code. But "pass" doesn't have code attached to it. Why
>should it be a function?
For consistancy with print. What it does doesn't matter any more than
what print did mattered.
Ross Ridge
--
l/ // Ross Ridge -- The Great HTMU
[oo][oo] rri...@csclub.uwaterloo.ca
-()-/()/ http://www.csclub.uwaterloo.ca/~rridge/
db //
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
