On Nov 20, 2012, at 1:16 PM, Tim Chase wrote: > Your statement can be ambiguously parsed as "I need to merely > *generate* time specifications that 'at' can parse", or it can be > parsed as "I need to generate *and consume* time specifications the > same way as 'at' does" > > If it's the former, it's pretty easy--'at' accepts a wide variety of > formats.
Fortunately, it's the former. Since posting my original query, I have discovered by experimentation that the API also accepts a string of digits as a unix timestamp, so this turns out to be trivial. --- Roy Smith r...@panix.com -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
