On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 10:57 AM, rh <richard_hubb...@lavabit.com> wrote: > On Wed, 21 Nov 2012 10:12:26 -0800 > Chris Rebert <c...@rebertia.com> wrote: >> On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 9:49 AM, rh <richard_hubb...@lavabit.com> >> wrote: >> > On Tue, 20 Nov 2012 20:41:42 +0300 >> > Andriy Kornatskyy <andriy.kornats...@live.com> wrote: <snip> >> > I'm looking at different technology right now on which to base a >> > site. I tried pyramid and after install it consumed 92MB of disk. >> > It seemed large and it turns out that it installed its own version >> > of python. Seems more complex to me, yet another python on disk. >> >> That's how virtualenvs (http://www.virtualenv.org/ ) normally work. >> Not really Pyramid's fault, it's more a deficiency of the current >> Python package management tools. > > There's still 92MB under pyramid, I just installed a new virtualenv and > installed wheezy.web, grand total 3.3MB. > > What deficiency?
"install[ing] its own version of python" -- Chris -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list