On Sunday, February 10, 2013 5:37:46 AM UTC-6, Steven D'Aprano wrote: > Rick Johnson wrote: > > IMO "Set Types" should only exists as a concequence of "freezing" an > > array, > > Sets are not frozen lists.
Indeed. That wording was a bit clumsy on my part. > > and should have NO literal syntax available. I may have spoken too soon on this issue. My reasoning for /not/ having a literal set syntax was due to symbol congestion, however as i described in another post, the problem can be solved by literally "type declaring" the literal. -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
