Apparently Travis Oliphant of numpy would like this as well...

http://technicaldiscovery.blogspot.com/2011/06/python-proposal-enhancements-i-wish-i.html

On Wednesday, February 13, 2013 2:00:15 PM UTC-5, steph...@gmail.com wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> 
> 
> Would it be feasible to modify the Python grammar to allow ':' to generate 
> slice objects everywhere rather than just indexers and top-level tuples of 
> indexers?
> 
> 
> 
> Right now in Py2.7, Py3.3:
> 
>     "obj[:,2]" yields "obj[slice(None),2]"
> 
> but
> 
>     "obj[(:,1),2]" is an error, instead of "obj[(slice(None), 1), 2]"
> 
> 
> 
> Also, more generally, you could imagine this working in (almost?) any 
> expression without ambiguity:
> 
>     "a = (1:2)" could yield "a = slice(1,2)"
> 
> 
> 
> See motivating discussion for this at:
> 
>     https://github.com/pydata/pandas/issues/2866
> 
> 
> 
> There might not be very many use cases for this currently outside of pandas, 
> but apparently the grammar was already modified to allow '...' outside 
> indexers and there's probably even fewer valid use cases for that:
> 
>     "e = ..." yields "e = Ellipsis"
> 
> 
> 
> Would there be any downside to changing the handling of ':' as well? It might 
> even make the grammar simpler, in some ways, since indexers won't have to be 
> treated specially.
> 
> 
> 
> Let me know if you have any thoughts.
> 
> 
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> Stephen

-- 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list

Reply via email to