On Sun, 07 Apr 2013 14:47:11 -0700, jhunter.dunefsky wrote: > Actually, my current licence can be found here: > https://github.com/jhunter-d/im.py/blob/master/LICENCE. Whaddaya think > about this, Useneters?
I think you're looking for a world of pain, when somebody uses your software, it breaks something, and they sue you. Your licence currently means that you are responsible for the performance of your software. Why don't you use a recognised, tested, legally-correct licence, like the MIT licence, instead of trying to be clever and/or lazy with a one-liner? E.g. http://opensource.org/licenses/MIT Software licencing is a solved problem. Do you really think that people write three or four paragraph licences because they *like* legal boilerplate? Did you imagine that you were the first person to think, "I know! I'll write a one-liner telling people they can do whatever they want with my software! Nothing can possibly go wrong!"? Use a known, tested, working solution, and save yourself the pain. -- Steven -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
