In article <[email protected]>,
 Chris Angelico <[email protected]> wrote:

> On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 11:41 AM, Roy Smith <[email protected]> wrote:
> > In article <[email protected]>,
> >  Steven D'Aprano <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> >> I don't see why you would need anything like that. Reading further on, I
> >> see that you are counting unimplemented rules as true, for some reason
> >> which I don't understand.
> >
> > The top-level logic we need to enforce is "this configuration doesn't
> > violate any rules".
> 
> Then have your unimplemented rules simply return True. Easy!
> 
> ChrisA

It's nice to have tri-state logic:

* This rule passes

* This rule fails

* This rule was not evaluated

What I've got now expresses that perfectly.
-- 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list

Reply via email to