On 07/22/2013 08:15 AM, Chris Angelico wrote: > If legit mail is rejected for failing an SPF check, it's the sending > admin's problem, not yours. You should never have problems with it if > it's set up correctly. And since rejected mail gets reported to the > transmitting MTA, you don't need to drop it in a spambox or anything. > It's not spam, it's simply invalid mail (equivalent to something sent > to a dud address).
Sure. Tell that to the people you work for who depend on e-mail. When I was a sysadmin (quite recently), I'd have gotten fired for enforcing such an arbitrary policy. Indeed when mail wasn't coming through that someone in the organization was expecting and wanting, regardless of SPF, it was indeed *my* problem and my job was on the line. BOFH attitudes simply aren't going to change that reality. SPF is just one more of the many things that are contributing overall to absolutely breaking and demise of SMTP. I'm afraid when it does finally cease to work, it's going to be replaced with less open, centrally-controlled messaging systems like facebook. Which is unfortunate. -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list