Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> On Sat, 31 Aug 2013 10:17:23 +0200, candide wrote:
>
>> What is the equivalent in Python 3 to the following Python 2 code:
>>
>> # -----------------------------
>> for i in range(5):
>> print i,
>> # -----------------------------
>>
>> ?
>>
>> Be careful that the above code doesn't add a trailing space after the
>> last number in the list,
>
> Of course it does. Have you actually tried it? The interactive
> interpreter is tricky, because you cannot directly follow a for-loop with
> another statement. If you try, the interactive interpreter gives you an
> indentation error. But we can work around it by sticking everything
> inside an if block, like so:
>
> py> if True:
> ... for i in range(5):
> ... print i,
> ... # could be pages of code here
> ... print "FINISHED"
> ...
> 0 1 2 3 4 FINISHED
>
>
> Or you could stick the code inside an exec, which doesn't have the same
> limitation as the interactive interpreter. This mimics the behaviour of
> code in a file:
>
> py> exec """for i in range(5):
> ... print i,
> ... print "FINISHED"
> ... """
> 0 1 2 3 4 FINISHED
>
>
> The same results occur with any other Python 2.x, and indeed all the way
> back to Python 1.5 and older.
Your test is flawed. The softspace mechanism ensures that there is a space
*between* all printed items, but not *after* the last printed item.
print "FINISHED"
will add a space while
print
will not. Compare:
>>> with open("tmp.txt", "w") as f:
... for i in range(3): print >> f, i,
... print >> f
...
>>> open("tmp.txt").read()
'0 1 2\n'
>>> with open("tmp.txt", "w") as f:
... for i in range(3): print >> f, i,
... print >> f, "FINISHED"
...
>>> open("tmp.txt").read()
'0 1 2 FINISHED\n'
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
