On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 2:54 PM, Grant Edwards <invalid@invalid.invalid>wrote:
> On 2013-09-27, Denis McMahon <denismfmcma...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Fri, 27 Sep 2013 18:32:23 +0100, Mark Lawrence wrote: > > > >> On 27/09/2013 18:00, Grant Edwards wrote: > >>> On 2013-09-27, ?????????? <nikos.gr...@gmail.com> wrote: > >>> > >>>> Sure your method follows the the logic in a straighforward way > >>>> step-by-step but i just dont want to spent almost 20 lines of code > >>>> just to calculate 2 variables(city and host). > >>> > >>> Does your provider charge you per line of code? > >>> > >>> If all that matters is the number of lines of code then use this: > >>> > >>> city,host = 0,0 > >>> > >>> Only _1_ nice short line of code. > >>> > >>> Happy? > >>> > >>> > >> Classic overengineering, fancy wasting two whole spaces and having such > >> long names. Surely c,h=0,0 is vastly superior? > > > > Why not c=h=0 > > > > 2 characters (28%) shorter! > > And 47% more opaque! > > -- > Grant Edwards grant.b.edwards Yow! ... he dominates > the > at DECADENT SUBWAY SCENE. > gmail.com > -- > https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list > better yet: i=l=0 The names have even less meaning, and they are thin -- less space -- Joel Goldstick http://joelgoldstick.com
-- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
