Den onsdagen den 30:e oktober 2013 kl. 11:11:17 UTC+1 skrev
[email protected]:
> Den onsdagen den 30:e oktober 2013 kl. 11:08:11 UTC+1 skrev
> [email protected]:
>
> > Den onsdagen den 30:e oktober 2013 kl. 08:07:31 UTC+1 skrev Tim Roberts:
>
> >
>
> > > [email protected] wrote:
>
> >
I suddenly realised i mixed code from a plain square system with the generic
exponential modulus system.
Here is the code, what it does is encode numbers in an exponential modulus
base. So it is basicly a numbersystem of my own you do not need to write out +
^ and exponent because the numbersystem create unique values for every natural
number.
Well without the + ^ it is hard to read but so are binary, ternary and
hexadecimal. I think the requirment for a numbersystem is that it have a
working arithmetic, and mine have.
So here is the working code, to write out exponential modulus number for and
exponent.
#!/usr/bin/python
import math
# Function definition is here
def sq(number):
exp=1
factor=2
multip=math.pow(2,exponent)
print(x,"= ", end="")
while number>=multip:
while exp<=number:
factor+=1
exp=math.pow(factor,exponent)
factor-=1
print(factor,"^",exponent,"+",sep="",end="")
exp=math.pow(factor,exponent)
number=number-exp
exp=1
factor=1
print(number)
#Set exponent here
exponent=2
print("Exp=x^",exponent,sep="")
#Set range of numbers x
for x in range (1,100):
sq(x)
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > > >
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > > >Why did Python not implement end... The end is really not necessary for
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > > >the programming language it can be excluded, but it is a courtesy to
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > > >the programmer and could easily be transformed to indents automaticly,
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > > >that is removed before the compiliation/interpretation of code.
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > > You only say that because your brain has been poisoned by languages that
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > > require some kind of "end". It's not necessary, and it's extra typing.
> > > 99%
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > > of programmers do the indentation anyway, to make the program easy to
> > > read,
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > > so why not just make it part of the syntax? That way, you don't
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > > accidentally have the indentation not match the syntax.
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > > --
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > > Tim Roberts, [email protected]
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > > Providenza & Boekelheide, Inc.
>
> >
>
> >
>
> >
>
> > Well Tim ***one could argue*** why not do a (i think it is called parser)
> > that react to "loop", "end" and "function". And lazy like me do not have to
> > think about "what is not part of program".
>
> >
>
> >
>
> >
>
> > I certainly do not like the old bracket style it was a catastrophe, but in
> > honesty the gui editor of python should have what i propose, a parser that
> > indent automaticly at loops, functions and end. I promise you it will save
> > millions of hours of bug searching all over world in a month.
>
>
>
> Instead of having going over indent manually, you just drop in an end it is
> so simple, no marking no meny indent unindent it is automaticly done. And
> that was the purpose of python to remove idiocies, like brackets and indents.
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
