Op 2005-07-07, Philippe C. Martin schreef <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > ???? > > Almost sounds like a racist comment - sorry if I misunderstood
I'll clarify. A lot of the time I hear arguments against features that boils down to. 1) I don't need it. 2) Having the feature will make my job more difficult. 3) I don't understand the merrits of the feature or I have difficulty understanding what it does when I encounter it. IMO these are arguments if followed sufficiently will lead to a language that is only usefull for mediocre programmers. > Antoon Pardon wrote: > >> Op 2005-07-06, Michele Simionato schreef <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >>> Fuzzyman: >>>> So Lisp is for really good programmers, and Python is for >>>> mediocre programmers ? >>> >>> >>> Python is *also* for mediocre programmers. I see this as a >>> strength, not as a weakness. >> >> But sometimes I get the impression people want it to evolve >> so it is only for mediocre programmers. >> > -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
