On 12/15/2013 08:33 AM, Wolfgang Keller wrote: >> I think PyQt is slowly being pushed aside in favor of PySide, which is >> more license-friendly for use in closed or open projects. I would >> recommend using PySide unless PyQt is a requirement for your project. > > Except the issue that Pyside always seems to lag a bit behind Qt > releases, while PyQt usually supports more recent releases of Qt.
Which is a bit odd, seeing as Pyside is an official Qt project. It was started by Nokia when they owned Qt, and now is hosted at the official Qt web site. > Besides that, according to what I've been reading on the PyQt mailing > list, support is impressive. The developer often fixes issues over > night, if there actually are any. And besides, again, a commercially > licensed PyQt itself isn't *that* expensive. That's good to know. -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
