On 12/20/2013 02:44 PM, Gregory Ewing wrote: > Serhiy Storchaka wrote: >> 20.12.13 16:19, Roy Smith написав(ла): >> >>> http://xkcd.com/1306/ >> >> QBASIC$, not $QBASIC. > > Or just QB$. (Most BASICs of that era only regarded > the first two characters as significant.)
Maybe BASIC's of the 70s. But Not QB. QuickBasic was a pretty impressive compiler in its day. Completely modern, structured language. And a pretty impressive IDE for its day that did some pretty slick source code navigation. -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
