On 21Feb2014 09:32, Roy Smith <r...@panix.com> wrote:
> In article <mailman.7230.1392992078.18130.python-l...@python.org>,
> Peter Otten <__pete...@web.de> wrote:
> > [x*x for (x,) in lst]
> >
> > [paraphrasing...] can be better written as:
> >
> > [x*x for [x] in items]
>
> I'm torn between, "Yes, the second form is distinctly easier to read"
> and, "If you think the second form is easier to read, you're admitting
> you're not really fluent in Python".
+1 QOTW
--
Cameron Simpson <c...@zip.com.au>
It is a tale told by an idiot, full of sound and fury, signifying nothing.
- William Shakespeare
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
