Hi all
I noticed this a little while ago, but dismissed it as a curiosity. On
reflection, I decided to mention it here in case it indicates a problem.
This is with python 3.3.2.
C:\>python -m timeit -s "import copy" "copy.copy('a'*1000)"
100000 loops, best of 3: 6.91 usec per loop
C:\>python -m timeit -s "import copy" "copy.deepcopy('a'*1000)"
100000 loops, best of 3: 11.8 usec per loop
C:\>python -m timeit -s "import copy" "copy.copy(b'a'*1000)"
10000 loops, best of 3: 79.9 usec per loop
C:\>python -m timeit -s "import copy" "copy.deepcopy(b'a'*1000)"
100000 loops, best of 3: 11.7 usec per loop
As you can see, deepcopying a string is slightly slower than copying it.
However, deepcopying a byte string is orders of magnitude quicker than
copying it.
Actually, looking closer, it is the 'copy' that is slow, not the 'deepcopy'
that is quick..
Expected, or odd?
Frank Millman
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
