On 20/03/2014 22:23, Marko Rauhamaa wrote:
Ned Batchelder <n...@nedbatchelder.com>:
On 3/20/14 4:59 PM, Marko Rauhamaa wrote:
Well, with proper care, I suppose the same code base could support perl
as well. ;)
I'm not sure how to take this comment. I feel like you are mocking my
choice. I wanted to make coverage.py available to as broad an audience
as possible, something that I think is worthwhile. Yes, there was an
engineering cost, but the tradeoff was worth it.
I can't judge if your particular choice was the right one. My only point
is that python2 and python3 are so far apart as to be regarded as
independent languages.
And I still say this is complete nonsense.
--
My fellow Pythonistas, ask not what our language can do for you, ask
what you can do for our language.
Mark Lawrence
---
This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection
is active.
http://www.avast.com
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
