On 3/21/14 11:15 PM, Chris Angelico wrote:
It compounds. One reply makes for double spacing... two makes
quadruple, three means we have seven wasted lines between every pair
of real lines. That gets pretty annoying. And considering that most
people who reply without cleaning up the lines also keep the entire
quoted text (and usually top-post as well), this gets big fast.

Yes, I can see that readily/ I get it, it just seems that fixing it at the source (gg) is the answer; because there will always be someone new to the list who is using gg because its part of their suite and because its convenient (I mean, that's why I tried to use it). I think we need to be beating up on the gg people so they get their stuff working.

Personally, I think that iterating over the lines in a file (in the
most obvious way) should strip delimiters.

   agreed.

most of the time you want to just treat a file as a series of
lines, and don't care about the distinctions. However, that ship has
sailed; it's way WAY too late to make any such change.

   agreed again, on both counts.

And changing it would not fix the Google Groups problem unless it also
broke a whole pile of other code out there.

No doubt. Well, I don't mind dealing with it/ and frankly, I don't really think its a python problem anyway at the root. All files should have standard delimiters. What I used to call flat-text files should have standard line-end delimiters, and standard file-end EOF markers. All OS's should comply with the standard... for instance, there should not be a windows x'0a' x'0d' line ending, and a unix x'0d' line ending.

Well, and now that I'm thinking about this again, since we have unicode, maybe we should have an entire set of standard "file" delimiters for flat-files.

But the bottom line (pun intended) is that I just want to suck the lines in, and I only want the system to have to handle the delimiters; I'm not asking for any changes mind you (at this point) just thinking out-loud.

Cheers dude.
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list

Reply via email to