On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 7:10 AM, Grant Edwards <invalid@invalid.invalid> wrote: > I left out a relevent fact: I'm not the one calling IMAP4_<whatever>. > > That's being done by the imapclient library. There's no way to pass > imapclient a custom class to use. It's hard-waired to call either > imaplib.IMAP4_stream(), imaplib.IMAP4(), or imaplib.IMAP4_SSL(). I > could create an IMAP4_TLS1 class, but I would then have to sub-class > imapclient.IMAPClient and override its _create_IMAP4() method to make > it call my IMAP4_TLS1() class instead of calling imaplib.IMAP4_SSL(). > > Monkey-patching imaplib seems a little better since it it doesn't > depend on assumptions about the internal workings of imapclient (other > than the fact that it uses imaplib.IMAP4_SSL).
That's an argument in favour of a minor case of serious monkey-patching. Although if you do feel dirty, try to hold on to that feeling because that is the proper reaction to being told that you're monkey-patching. ChrisA okay, now I feel like a moron... not just a regular moron, though... -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list