On Wed, 13 Jul 2005 23:39:46 GMT, in sci.geo.earthquakes, "Hank Oredson"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>"edgrsprj" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
>> "Hank Oredson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
>> news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> "edgrsprj" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
>>> news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> > "Hank Oredson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
>>> > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> >> "edgrsprj" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
>>> >> news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> >> > "edgrsprj" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
>>> >> > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> >> >> PROPOSED EARTHQUAKE FORECASTING
>>> >> >> COMPUTER PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT EFFORT
>>> I guess my question was not specific enough.
>>> What I wanted was the exact sources, so I could access the data.
>>> The exact data sets you used.
>> July 13, 2005
>> Thanks again for the comments and interest.
>> The original report in this thread should have contained pointers to
>> all of the information you are requesting. But once again, here are some
>> the important URLs.
>> That Web page contains information regarding the details of how the
>> forecasting program works. Also stored there are copies of an early
>> Zipped .txt version of the Perl program I am using along with Zip file
>> versions of earlier versions of the .txt format database files that I am
>> using. I had to Zip them because of their size and the limited bandwidth
>> that Web site. If you would prefer to receive them as regular text files
>> then you can try contacting me by e-mail and I will try to send them
>> Perl users who downloaded and ran that .pl program some time ago
>> that they had no trouble getting it to run on a Window's XP system. Other
>> operating system users might encounter a few formatting problems etc.
>> Those Web pages discuss the theories involved with this forecasting
>> method. Some of the most important information is at the end of that
>> 128.html Web page.
>I found no equations there, nor any links to the original data sources.
>> That Web page contains several types of forecast data along with
>> information regarding how to interpret them.
>Did not find any information on the source of the data.
>> That Web page contains some "Help" information with details
>> things such as the U.S. Navy's MICA computer program which I use to
>> data for things such as the locations of the Earth, sun, and moon relative
>> to the J2000 reference system.
>> You should not expect to be able to instantly absorb all of that
>> information though it sounds like understanding it should not be a problem
>> for you. I have been working on the project for about 15 years. And
>> unfortunately, every improvement seems to take days, weeks, months, ...
>Everything looked fairly obvious, except that there did not seem
>to be any reference to the source of the datasets.
>> Additionally, as I said in my first report in this thread, the
>> multiple participants part of the project is not yet operational. For one
>> thing, a suitable Web site has to be found. Right now I am simply
>> trying to determine what the interest level there might be in such a
>> project. And positive feedback that I have been getting by e-mail etc.
>> has been encouraging.
>Perhaps I was not clear enough in my previous posts.
>I am looking for the SOURCE of the data, that is, where did
>YOU get the data from, so that I may obtain my own datasets.
>In particular I am interested in the EM dataset.
There isn't any "data set"
There are no "formula"...
There is only EGD
Look down to the middle of the page E.D.G.
Listed as "Cranky"