Simon Dahlbacka wrote:
> Oooh.. you make my eyes bleed. IMO that proposal is butt ugly (and
> looks like the C++.NET perversions.)
I haven't had the displeasure of using C++.NET fortunately.
point = [5,(10,20,5)]
size,t = point
x,y,z = t
size,x,y,z = point, point, point, point
size,x,y,z = point, ^point # Not uglier than the above.
size,(x,y,z) = point # Not as nice as this.
I forget sometimes that this last one is allowed, so ()'s on the left of
the assignment is an explicit unpack. Seems I'm tried to reinvent the
wheel yet again.