Joel Goldstick wrote:
I've been following along here, and it seems you haven't received the answer you want or need.
So far I received exactly the answer I was expecting. 0 examples of NaN!=NaN being beneficial. I wasn't asking for help, I was making a point. Whether that will lead to improvement of Python, well, I'm not too optimistic, but I feel the point was worth making regardless.
regards, Anders -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
